Coastal areas in the Gaza Strip Israeli forces of international humanitarian relief fleet opened fire, killing nearly 20 people killed after the incident, the international community, including the United Nations have strongly condemned. This assault occurred because the rescue fleet and follow-up effects, it is worth our serious consideration.

The Israeli attack on the rescue fleet, fully showed the Israeli regime wishing to Hamas out of Gaza, already failed strategy.

The attack by the Israeli army rescue fleet, fully showed the Israeli regime wishing to Hamas out of Gaza, already failed strategy.

Over the past year, Israel insists that Hamas stop the rocket attack south of the border town, but Hamas is not willing to be responsible for rocket attacks, but to stop the Israeli attacks on Gaza first and Gaza borders open, the two sides attacked each other.

Another Israeli air strike in Gaza purpose is to enable the Palestinian people can’t bear to force Hamas to change the hard-line stance against Israel, or to the Gaza population to rise up against the Hamas regime; but on these two points, the air strikes in Gaza can be said to point of no avail.

Gaza is now the only smooth contact with the outside world is the water pipe, a large number of livelihood of the people of Gaza have to rely on relief supplies delivery fleet, but the Israeli rescue vessels suspected of smuggling arms to Hamas, it has always been wary of the rescue fleet.

The attack rescue fleet incident several factors should be noted: First, the current Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's policy ineffective popularity decline, domestic accused the government of improperly handling the Israeli-Palestinian issue was banned; Netanyahu to keep power is bound to have a more hard-line Hamas acts, including attacks on international relief fleet, or even cut off Gaza to curb foreign aid. But the Israeli attack on the fleet move to rescue the international revulsion not only the Arab countries, is poised to strike back, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is bound to intensify.

Second, Hamas and Fatah the West Bank is bound to intensify the conflict between. Hamas, the original plan is that by attacking the south border town, sparking Israel's dissatisfaction with air strikes in Gaza, taking advantage of popular support to seize power from Fatah, the ruling to cover the situation in Gaza itself. The Israeli army has provoked violence on the rescue fleet a number of Palestinian grievances, coupled with prospects for young people to become confused under the radical, eager to join Hamas, a militant group that shares a steady stream of new blood.

Again, the international community to intervene, or continue to stand by the resolution of conflicts is a challenge; particular efforts to promote peace in the Middle East, President Obama is a severe test. The international community, especially the Arab world unanimously condemned the Israeli atrocities, Obama in addition to "regret", the measured point is the attitude to be just right, do not let the Arab world that he side with Israel, but Israel can’t be heavy-handed, otherwise would offend the United States a strong Jewish influence. Shows that Obama would like to bring the Israeli-Palestinian peace, rebuilding the U.S. relationship with the Islamic vision of the world will face many difficulties.

New York Times earlier to "Israel factor" published an editorial point and over a period of time, the tendency of this report is vastly different; this report has been published in previous years, "Israel has large can’t be ignored" point of view, the But the U.S. government Warning: Israel to influence U.S. Middle East policy, plays a "disproportionate" role, and reminded the U.S. government, U.S. policy must be "other benefits" to measure, but can’t let the "Israeli abuse of Washington of support. "

The New York Times editorial structure in contrast with the U.S. Middle East policy, it can be found in the performance of the two is quite consistent. Observation of the United States on Middle East policy, whether by the time point of view, or from the space point of view, are displayed by the United States self-interest as the guiding principle, but at this stage can best embody the interests of the U.S. Middle East policy is "status quo" .

United States, the highest this policy agenda is "to support Palestinian statehood", the minimum program is "to compress in a small area of conflict." The United States, its Middle East policy based on "Arab world" as the center, and to "Israel" as a pawn; central relationship is not close to making the "pawn" role to play nothing but "pieces" of the role is not large to the anti-be "pieces" used.

At present the United Nations humanitarian assistance should Gaza, because long-term blockade by Israel Erzhi material scarcity in many people's livelihood, rather than as Concept staged scenes of human tragedy in Gaza.