Dishonesty about healthcare reform
- Author Marcus Stalder
- Published February 10, 2011
- Word count 546
As if things were not complicated enough, there has been a flood of corporate money into the political arena - thanks to the Supreme Court under Roberts in the case of Citizens United vs. FEC. It would not be unfair to describe the current situation as watching a waking giant suddenly walk through the campaign landscape. Anonymous donors are funding attack ads and the spread of highly misleading information about the current economic situation in general and the healthcare reforms in particular. As we head off to the polls, it's therefore wise to draw breath and consider the extent of the dishonesty. Frankly, it's no wonder the electorate are anxious and confused.
So let's start with a few basics. First, the majority of the reforms are not due to come into force until 2014. This gives us plenty of time to work out the precise effects as implementation gradually eases us into full compliance. Second, the major fault with the reform is that it does nothing to control the prices of drugs or the treatments we receive. Imagine the debate in the White House. Potentially, we are picking a fight with the insurance industry, the healthcare industry, and the pharmaceutical manufacturers. This is a triple whammy. So, the President and his advisors decided to narrow the field to the insurance industry, hoping the premium rates and the cost of drugs, devices and treatments would take care of themselves. If the ads are attacking this cowardly failure, they are right. Without control over the prices, premiums are almost bound to rise.
Now a few words of reassurance. There's nothing in the Act to force you to go through an official to get to a doctor. You will be able to choose your own doctor or insurance plan without anyone second-guessing you. There's also no right for illegal immigrants to buy cover. They stay outside the system altogether. This will leave the current insurance companies to sell the policies whether directly or through the new exchanges. There's no government takeover. Indeed, all the exchanges do is promote competition between the insurers. Premium rates should fall. This is supposed to be what capitalism is all about.
If insurers do increase their premiums, most states have the power to review the increases and decide whether they are justified. Hopefully, more states will use this power to protect you. The Justice Department has just filed suit against Blue Cross and Blue Shield for abusing its dominant position in Michigan to force up its competitors' costs. Finally, there's no threat to Medicare benefits. In fact, the benefits will either stay as they are or increase slowly. The only people who will see a change are the members of the Medicare Advantage plans who will lose some of their unjustified subsidies.
It's true that this is a big change to the health insurance market. But we already see advantages. Insurers can no longer reject children on the basis of a pre-existing condition, young adults can stay on their parents policies until 26, insurers cannot cancel your policy if you fall sick, and so on. Health insurance has always been complicated and it remains so now. But there's no need to panic. No matter what the attack ads say, the changes should end up favoring you.
Marcus Stalder is always ready to share his professional point of view on a topic. To see what Marcus Stalder has written about other things visit [http://www.hiinetwork.com/dishonesty-of-the-media.html](http://www.hiinetwork.com/dishonesty-of-the-media.html).
Article source: https://articlebiz.comRate article
Article comments
There are no posted comments.
Related articles
- Minimalist or Statement Sliding Barn Door: Which Is Right for Your Space
- How to Style Antique Indian Armoires & Sideboards in a Modern Home
- Custom Antique Doors: How Mogul Interior Sizes Vintage Doors to Fit Any Space
- Personalized Dining Experiences: How AI POS Systems Learn Your Customers’ Preferences
- Perth Is One of Australia's Fastest Growing Cities. Here Is What That Looks Like on the Ground
- Ireland–China Relations: A Century Built on Exchange and Understanding
- Mindfulness: Living in Harmony with the Elements
- Lash Extension Aftercare Starts With Proper Removal
- How Lash Techs Can Make Removal Appointments More Comfortable
- Electric And Hybrid Car Leasing: The Smart Move For 2026
- What Clients Should Know Before a Lash Extension Removal Appointment
- Common Lash Removal Mistakes New Lash Techs Should Avoid
- Lash Remover Cream vs. Liquid Remover: What Lash Techs Should Know
- Common Lash Removal Mistakes New Lash Techs Should Avoid
- Lash Remover Cream vs. Liquid Remover: What Lash Techs Should Know
- Common Eyebrow Tint Mistakes and How to Avoid Them
- Outdoor Makeup Tips for Hot Days: What to Keep Simple Around the Eyes
- How to Choose the Right Brow Tint Shade for a Natural Look
- Best Eye Makeup Ideas for Summer Travel and Weekend Trips
- Magnetic Lashes vs. Strip Lashes: Which Is Easier for Beginners?
- Lotus Carved Decorative Doors
- Where Your Donation Matters Most: Helping the Poor with Medical Care and Animal Welfare in India
- Solutions For Clinical Trials
- How Sponsoring Elderly Care in India Creates Lasting Social Impact
- Motorcycle Accidents in Hattiesburg: Mississippi's Pure Comparative Fault Advantage and How It Protects Injured Riders
- Dog Bite Injuries in Colorado: How the Strict Liability Statute Works and What Injured Victims Can Recover
- Truck Accident Claims in Green Bay: How Local Industries Shape Liability
- Dog Bites in San Luis Obispo: California's Strict Liability & What It Means for Victims
- How the Region's Paper and Food Processing Industries Shape the Commercial Vehicle Liability Landscape
- Colorado Dog Bite Injury Claims and What the State's Strict Liability Law Means for Victims