5 Timber Frame Misguided beliefs Debunked


  • Author Martin Aho
  • Published December 26, 2011
  • Word count 526

While making use of timber frame in construction happens to be more popular during the last few years, lots of people still have numerous worries regarding it. Whenever presented with a choice between using timber frames and making use of more traditional elements like bricks and concrete, a lot of people choose the last mentioned. This is not always because the old fashioned materials are better, but because their choice is normally impacted by the numerous myths that are associated with timber frames. In order to aid individuals create a more smart and educated option, we will be debunking many of the most common timber frame myths:

Myth # 1: "In comparison to the much more conventional buildings, those built from timber frame are more vulnerable to fire."

The primary myth concerning timber framing is the fact that since the components is created out of wood, it will simply catch fire. If it involves fire, caution always has to be used no matter what the components of that structure is. Buildings that are made of old fashioned stones and concrete are simply as vulnerable to fire as timber framed buildings are. Timber framing involves lining the walls with plasterboards, which provide additional defense if there is fire. Plasterboards can stay fire-resistant for about an hour.

Myth # 2: "Timber framing is far more expensive than old fashioned construction materials."

Another myth about timber framing is that it costs more compared to utilizing traditional materials. The truth is that they cost about the same. When you evaluate the charge of the overall construction, timber framing saves on overhead costs and labor costs because it often takes quicker to do. There's also little waste, and so all the materials are maximized. This levels out with the expense of the conventional stone and concrete, which takes so much longer to finish.

Myth # 3: "Timber frames are bad for the environment."

Timber framing utilizes trees, so many people believe that moving to timber framing from traditional construction components could be possibly damaging to the ecosystem. On the other hand, it actually requires a lot much less power to make timber frames from trees compared to the power it requires to create concrete, steel, and bricks. The procedure for creating the traditional construction materials produces a lot more carbon pollutants and waste, thus timber framing is actually less hazardous for the natural environment.

Myth # 4: "Concrete buildings are stronger and stay longer than those made from timber frame."

Since they're more accustomed to cement, some people instantly believe that buildings constructed from timber frame are much less durable. Furthermore, they think that they will not last long. Timber framed buildings can actually tolerate the test of time. They're just as sturdy as your regular building and they'll last just as long.

Myth # 5: "Timber framing makes mortgage and insurance difficult."

In relation to utilizing timber framing for homes, people think that they'll have issues with banks and insurance firms. This is because they instantly think that timber frame houses are dangerous, and they think these loan companies will assume the same. The the fact is that so long as it's correctly constructed, loan companies won't make any differences.

Brent works on timber frame design for a large timber frame company. Find out more about timber frame construction details at his website about ==> timber frame joints.

Article source: http://articlebiz.com
This article has been viewed 534 times.

Rate article

Article comments

There are no posted comments.