Nowadays, a software program is evidently an essential aspect in a company's success in the global market. In this context, corporate software quality is extremely important, and any costs related to deficiencies, bugs or errors in the later stages of the software lifetime can't be allowed. For this reason, a lot of software suppliers and their customers are embracing new systems and procedures to enhance the quality and security levels of their software program.

However, regardless of the general trend in increasing quality, many software enterprises are launching applications which are supervised and continually improved. Why? Because as demand for particular software for particular business processes is growing worldwide, the complexity related to software development also are growing exponentially. These complications include, amongst others, the great variety of resources and types of services available, required compatibility with present legislation, the growing complexity of technologies as well as development processes, and a clearly weakened economy.

Regarding the resources and kinds of services, organizations can currently choose from in-sourcing, out-sourcing and co-sourcing, and even go for free software (open source). In addition, out-sourcing could mean that the work is carried out on the customer's premises or at the venue of the supplier. Put simply, development teams are dispersed, and quality assurance requires a more effective and transparent form of programming to facilitate the development by diverse teams and, accordingly, the caliber of the software.

However, the obligation of providers to make sure software compliance with national and worldwide legislation and other regulations, as well as the localization of the software in order to compete in a worldwide industry, also demands efficient control over the quality and transparency of their processes. The results and expenses of a poor level of security, adds an extra layer of complexity, and acts as another incentive for companies to adopt a good quality policy in all its operations, and particularly in developing the program.

Similarly, the fast speed in which technology is evolving, with innovations for multicore, collaborative Web usage, etc., requires a special approach in order to really benefit from these new improvements in engineering and use them to boost quality.

Ultimately, the present financial crisis, with a significant decrease in resources, makes any errors in the software program or significant deficiencies become critical and, in many cases, the results and expenses are unmanageable by the companies concerned. Which means that the margin of error for software firms significantly decreases as there are less staff and financial assets open to respond.

It seems a lot more than obvious that in a complicated environment such as the one we've got today, a comprehensive quality strategy and an effective quality system applied during the entire software life-cycle end up being vital to promote the success of both the client and the software firm in the worldwide market.