Different Elements of Negligence in an Injury Case
- Author Aaron Crane
- Published May 7, 2016
- Word count 667
If somebody is involved in a motor vehicle collision, and they sustain injuries and/or property damage, the legal theory that they're likely to make a claim under is the theory of negligence. Arizona requires a person claiming negligence to prove four elements. This is a solid reason why having a Phoenix car accident attorney increases your changes of a successful settlement. If he or she fails to prove any single element, their entire claim fails. These elements of negligence are:
A breach of that duty
That the breach of that duty caused the claimant's injuries and/or property damage
That the damages claimed caused legally recognized damages
- Duty of Use
Anybody who gets behind the wheel of a motor vehicle has a duty to use due care and caution for the safety of the person and property of anybody else who might be on or about the roadway. Those people might include other motorists, passengers, motorcyclists, bicyclists or pedestrians who on the roadway or sidewalks next to it. Examples of a driver's duty include but are not limited to:
Not exceed the speed limit
Maintaining a proper lookout for others on the roadway
Maintaining a proper interval
Reducing speed to avoid an accident
Yielding the right-of-way
- Breach of duty
A person breaches a duty when he or she fails to exercise reasonable care. Whether a duty exists is a question of law to be determined by a judge. Whether there was a breach of duty is a question of fact to be decided by a jury.
- Causation of an Injury
The person claiming injuries and damages must prove that the defendant's acts or failure to act was the cause of their injuries and/or property damage. This is a "but for" test – don’t laugh, it is true! The causation issue becomes a question of fact. But for the acts or failure to act of the defendant, would the claimant's injuries and/or property damage not have occurred? For example, would this auto accident not have occurred if that driver had not turned left into the claimant's path of travel? If the cars were traveling in opposite directions going straight, the accident never would have happened.
The claimant must prove legally recognized damages. The amount of any damages to be awarded is a question of fact to be decided by a jury. Damages are usually claimed in the form of actual physical injury to the person's body and/or damage to their property. Just some examples of damages might be:
Medical and therapy bills
Past lost earnings and any future earnings lost
Any permanent disfigurement
Any permanent disability
Any property damage
- Comparative Negligence
There are times when both parties fail to use due care and caution, and a claimant is partially responsible or their own injuries. When that occurs, the law of comparative negligence applies. Comparative negligence weighs the percentage of negligence attributable to each party in a motor vehicle collision. In many cases there's no comparative negligence at all. When it does apply, the jury will determine the percentage of fault attributable to each party and deduct the percentage of negligence attributable to the claimant from their award. If the claimant's damages were determined to be $100,000, but he or she was determined to be 30 percent negligent, their net award would be reduced down to $70,000.
Pure comparative negligence
Arizona is in the minority of states that are known as pure comparative negligence states. Even if a claimant is 80 percent at fault for an accident, that doesn't bar he or she from recovery.
The law of negligence involves very complex litigation. If you or somebody close to you has been injured in a motor vehicle collision, and you believe it was the fault of somebody else, contact the auto accident attorneys at Cantor Crane at 602-254-2701 for a free consultation and case evaluation. When you're injured by the negligence of somebody else, you deserve fair and just compensation.
Call Phoenix car accident attorney Cantor Crane at (602) 254-2701 if you have been involved in an auto accident. Knowing what to do after a car accident and having an attorney on your side can make a big difference in your case and insurance compensation for your damages.Article source: http://articlebiz.com
There are no posted comments.
- The 5 Biggest GDPR Fines To Date
- Who Is Exempt from Wearing Seat Belts?
- Family Law Attorney - You Would Be Surprised At How Important They Are!
- Threshold Could Be Reduced for Blood Pressure Lowering Drugs
- What Are the Few Things You Will Need to Know About Child Custody in a Separation
- Finance Options for Civil Litigation
- What to do if you are struck by a driver without a license in pasca?
- 5 Tips to Choose the Best Lawyer in Dubai For Your Case
- Breathalyzers in DUI Cases Explained
- What is a Field Sobriety Test in a DUI case?
- Military Service & Criminal Convictions
- California's Three Strikes Law Overview
- Ex Post Facto Explained by Criminal Defense Lawyers
- Possession of Drug Paraphernalia Law in CA
- Gun Silencer Law in California
- Stolen Valor Crimes & Defenses
- New PC 290 Law in California
- Prop 57 Law
- Everything You Need To Consider When Choosing And Hiring A Personal Injury Solicitor
- Value of Car accident lawyer
- How to Calculate Child Support
- Reason To Pursue A Personal Injury Case
- Divorce Lawyer/Attorney to Take Care of Your Divorce/Dissolution of Marriage
- The LA Criminal Defense Law Firm
- Let Trump keep looking at H-1Bs; there is a much better option for immigrants
- The Difference Between Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
- Forged Documents, Counterfeit Goods, Cyber Intrusion Including Identity Theft Have Become a Symbol Of Our 21st Century Culture
- Restrictions on some professions when striking
- Finding a Handwriting Expert in Canada or Handwriting Analyst is Tricky, Here's What To Look For