Turf Wars and Latin Music Duos: Claims of Trademark Infringement in "Loisaidas" Film Series Dismissed
- Author Andrei Moskvitch
- Published August 19, 2016
- Word count 472
What comes to mind when hearing of drug wars, rap music, and Manhattan’s Lower East Side? Trademark infringement? Correct! Well, these elements all feature prominently in a June decision by New York’s Southern District Court, which dismissed infringement claims against producers Kanye West and Damon Dash over their use of the title "Loisaidas" for an eight part film series depicting a turf war in the iconic neighborhood. The ruling centres on the use of trademarked terms whose expressive meanings reach beyond the scope of the owner’s legal right.
Plaintiff Michael Medina named his Latin music duo "Loisaidas," trademarking the name for music videos and song recordings in 2011. He filed a lawsuit against West and Dash, complaining that the defendants infringed Medina’s mark, violating the Lanham Act and related state law, after using "Loisaidas" in a series of "music videos." The defendants rejected Medina’s claims, arguing the project was a series of films, rather than music videos.
The court rejected the plaintiff’s argument that West and Dash used "Loisaidas" in reference to Medina’s work rather than its colloquial meaning, in other words as a slang word to describe Lower East Side natives. The decision noted that the defendants "obviously" used the term to refer to a location. It further noted the Second Circuit’s decisions in Twin Peaks Prods. Inc. v. Publ’ns Int’l Ltd. and Rogers v. Grimaldi to control a motion to dismiss, since the term at issue was an artistic work’s title. Under Twin Peaks and Rogers, the Circuit held that it must first see whether the trademarked title has any artistic relevance to the work in question. If that relevance exists, then the court must judge whether a likelihood of confusion exists, applying relevant factors to determine whether the title is misleading.
To avoid encroaching upon First Amendment values, the decision reinforced a narrow interpretation of the Lanham Act. Since the publicity value of Medina’s music was not exploited by West and Dash, their film series "clearly has artistic relevance to a series of short films about drug dealers seeking to acquire control of the drug trade in Manhattan’s Lower East Side." The plaintiff never held that the defendants suggested any coordination or relationship between the two parties, and because "Loisaidas" had public meaning prior to its trademarking, Medina was unable to "stake his claim to a pre-existing term and then attempt to remove all expressive use from public circulation." At the heart of the matter is the issue of what legal protections, or lack thereof, exist for trademark owners when their mark assumes an expressive meaning separate from it’s source-identifying purpose? For Medina, those protections are few and far between. For West and Dash, that means another eight-part "Loisaidas" turf war may be on the table.
Andrei Moskvitch created the
GrillIP.com - patents news educational IP blog. His knowledge of the US, European and Russian patent, trademark and copyright law is based on his work as Director, Patent Operations at a global IT company and his experience as an associate in IP practice at a major international law firm.
Article source: https://articlebiz.comRate article
Article comments
There are no posted comments.
Related articles
- Pedestrian Accidents: Know Your Legal Rights from a Brownsville Personal Injury Lawyer
- Choosing the Best Greenville Injury Attorney for Workplace Injuries
- Choosing the Best Greenville Injury Attorney for Workplace Injuries
- International Shipping Made Simple with DTDC International Courier
- Choosing the Right International Shipping Services and Understanding International Shipping Rates
- Send Parcels Worldwide with a Trusted International Courier Service in Delhi
- Navigating Family Law with a Divorce Lawyer in Austin
- My employer has presented me with a Settlement Agreement. What do I do now?
- Behind Every Successful Deal: The Lawyer’s Role in M&A Strategy
- Why You Need a Personal Injury Attorney in Seattle After an Accident
- Why You Need a Local Irvine Personal Injury Lawyer After an Accident
- Why Local Expertise Matters: Benefits of Hiring an Indiana Car Accident Lawyer
- Why Foreclosure Defense Matters
- How Personal Injury Lawyers in North Charleston Handle Insurance Companies
- From Your Home to Anywhere – Reliable Global Shipping Solutions
- Temporary WiFi and Data Analytics in Events
- How an Okatie Car Accident Lawyer Can Help with a Hit-and-Run Case
- Content Analysis: Uncovering the Hidden Meaning
- criminal defense attorney irvine
- 7 Mistakes to Avoid When Hiring a Personal Injury Lawyer in Clearfield
- 10 Signs You Need a Personal Injury Lawyer in Rockford
- Why You Should Hire a Personal Injury Lawyer in Tampa After an Accident
- Canada’s Regions Blocking Low-Wage LMIAs
- How the IRS Is Changing and Why You Need a Tax Attorney Now More Than Ever
- When to Call a Car Accident Lawyer in San Antonio After a Wreck
- What to Expect During Your First Consultation With a New Haven Personal Injury Lawyer
- How a Waterbury Auto Accident Lawyer Can Maximize Your Settlement
- Contracts That Win: Why Legal Precision Is Key to Business Success
- How the IRS Is Cracking Down on Tax Debt (And What You Can Do About It)
- Top Questions to Ask a Carmel Personal Injury Lawyer During Your Consultation