Unsafe Products and Protecting Yourself
- Author Alan Haburchak
- Published March 21, 2008
- Word count 506
Millions of Americans place their faith in manufacturers of products ranging from everyday headache medicine to cleaning products, however, what many U.S. citizens are unaware of is what happens and what steps to take after the purchase of a faulty product, or, a product that is merely unsafe. The most important step an individual can take to protecting themselves from unsafe products is to know and understand the legalities behind consumer rights.
Reasonable Care
The term "reasonable care" or "standard of care" often comes up in unsafe products litigation, and for good reason: a product's liability often comes down to reasonable care. The law expects that both manufacturers and consumers will act with reasonable care.
Basically, this tenet means that a reasonable manufacturer would do everything in its power to develop a safe and marketable product, while a reasonable consumer would take heed of product warnings and use a product in its intended manner. For example, it is reasonable for a manufacturer to design automobiles to be crashworthy, or able to sustain an automobile accident with minimal impact and injury to passengers. At the same time, it is reasonable for a customer to drive an automobile in a rational and safe manner. Although, a manufacturer is not at fault if an individual behaves in an erratic manner no matter what the results of a vehicle crash or other destruction may occur.
Reasonable care extends to the actions of consumers when using a product. An example of this comes down to if a consumer disregards a warning label on a product, which was placed on the product under reasonable standard of care.
Unavoidable Dangers
Under the standard of reasonable care, manufacturers are expected to adequately warn consumers about the potential dangers of their products. However, manufacturers cannot be held liable for unavoidable dangers of a product. For example, manufacturers often place potentially unsafe products - such as heavy machinery or drugs - on the market. Consumers who disregard the risks and warnings of heavy machinery or prescription drugs cannot reasonable hold a manufacturer or company liable for their erratic actions.
Caveat Emptor No More?
The law used to favor businesses with a strict caveat emptor ("let the buyer beware") interpretation of products liability law. However, the courts are beginning to recognize more and more responsibility on the part of businesses and manufacturers to inform their customers about the inherent risks of their products and to design their products with safety in mind.
Businesses are liable for products that pose a danger to consumers. This is a good tool for consumer protection - strict liability laws hold manufacturers accountable for educating the buyer and creating safe products for consumers and gives consumers redress when they have suffered injury from an unsafe product. If you have been harmed by an unsafe product, consider contacting an attorney experienced in the field of products liability law. A lawyer with experience in unsafe products litigation can help assess whether you have a valid claim and lead you through the legal process.
LegalView is the number one source on the Internet for legal information, visit http://www.LegalView.com to learn about a variety of legal topics, legal information and jury verdicts on these related topics. Find information on traumatic brain injury at http://brain-injury.legalview.com or learn how to contact an experienced auto accident law firm at http://crash.legalview.com/ .
Article source: https://articlebiz.comRate article
Article comments
There are no posted comments.
Related articles
- How a Calgary Personal Injury Lawyer Can Maximize Your Compensation
- Navigating the Aftermath: Your Guide to Finding a Car Accident Lawyer Near Me with Karasik Law Group
- What to Expect from a Trademark Search Company
- Are You Unknowingly Signing Away Your Mechanic Lien Rights?
- The Role of Diplomacy in Unrecognized States: A Case Study of Somaliland
- Ontario’s New Homeowner Protection Act
- Why Nanda & Associates Lawyers Are the Top Choice in Brampton
- Essential Contracts Every Freelancer Should Have
- What to Do When Your Ex Violates a Custody Agreement
- How Houston Personal Injury Lawyers Handle Insurance Companies
- How to Prepare for Your First Meeting with a Personal Injury Lawyer in Orlando
- Best Books for Defense lawyer for Felony Robbery
- Establishing a Company in Serbia: A Guide to Business Ownership Types
- How To Get Compensation for a Work Injury
- Navigating Compliance for Personal and Professional Contributions
- Unraveling the Mysteries of Intellectual Property Law: A Comprehensive Guide
- Boston Car Accident Attorneys and Insurance Companies: A Complex Relationship
- How a Los Angeles Car Accident Attorney Can Help You
- Slip and Fall in Chula Vista: Who is Accountable?
- Can I Get Compensated After a Truck Accident in Los Angeles
- Local Tax Attorney vs Competitors: A Comparative Analysis of Legal Services in Orlando
- J. David Tax Law: Your Top Tax Levy Lawyer in North Carolina
- Who Can Garnish Tax Refunds: Your Questions Answered
- Unlock the Secrets to Handling a North Carolina Notice of Deficiency
- The Importance of Financial Services: Enabling Debt Management and Legal Debt Settlement
- Justin C Freeman
- What are the Eligibility Criteria for a Spouse Visa? How to find right Spouse Visa Attorney in Houston?
- Importance, Benefits, and Tips for Hiring a Houston Immigration Attorney
- Importance and Tips of Hiring a Houston Immigration Attorney
- The Importance of Protecting Whistleblowers