Why is CBS's Smith so fun?
Arts & Entertainment → Television / Movies
- Author Fabiola Groshan
- Published September 30, 2006
- Word count 546
The premise of Smith is completely ridiculous: A family man (Ray Liotta) is actually a master thief, who travels around the country pulling off grand heists. He has a team of specialists who assist him, and none are redeeming characters. So, we are supposed to root for a guy who deceives his wife and son, is a mercenary, and is a man who witnesses the death of a team member and walks away with no remorse? On paper, this all seems a tad unpleasant, doesn't it? Well, somehow, it's not. With Smith, CBS has created one of the most entertaining and gleefully evil shows televison has seen in a long time.
Smith is a derivative of the type of cinema currently embodied by the works of Tarantino. Hardened anti-heroes who do bad things, yet still remain in the viewer's good graces. Like characters on “The Sopranos”, we would not be friends with these people in real life. We wouldn't like them and, in all likelihood, we'd be scared of them. However, in the context of their own, specific universe, we can root for them and become caught up in their plight. Why? I don't think it's over-simplifying it to say that it's just entertaining. Smith focuses on Bobby Steven's team pulling off high-stakes robberies. As long as these robberies are exciting (which they have been so far) the viewers will be tuning in.
Viewers can forgive a lot when it comes to their protagonists. People identify with flawed characters because they themselves are flawed. When Simon Baker's character on Smith mercilessly guns down two thugs, simply because they kicked him off their private beach, we identify with him. We don't agree with harshness of his reaction and would never consider doing what he did (I don't own a sniper rifle, anyway) but we respect that he stood up for himself and would like to believe that we'd stand for oursleves in the same situation. Anti-heroes take reality and accentuate to a degree that the layman will never know.
Smith is good only because it's characters are the bad people they are. I've heard complaints that the characters on Smith are so totally unredeemable that they just can't watch Smith. Well, how would the show work if Ray Liotta played Bobby Stevens as a nice, warm-hearted, respectful, stand-up guy? It would seem wildly improbable for a guy like that to be involved in the world of high-stakes robberies. Of course, this seems obvious, but it's a key issue to ponder over when discussing the premise of any show. When creating a TV show, you typically begin with the premise. I'm sure that was the genesis of Smith. Creator Jon Wells probably thought, “Hmm, you know what'd be cool? If there was a show where a team of thieves pulled off a different heist every week.” From there, what kind of a main character do you create? There aren't a lot of options. Sticking to take-no-prisoners bad ass is usually the best choice.
Smith is still early in it's run and it could easily drop off in quality as the season goes along. I hope not, because CBS has created a show that is fun, full of action and uncompromising in it's vision.
-Oscar Dahl, BuddyTV Senior Writer
So, if you want to find out more information about Smith or especially about Smith TV Show, please visit this link BuddyTV Television
Article source: https://articlebiz.comRate article
Article comments
Related articles
- “When the Camera Lies: The True Stories Behind Hollywood’s Greatest Myths.”
- “Chaos Behind the Camera: Legendary On-Set Feuds and Filmmaking Nightmares That Changed Hollywood Forever.”
- “Alternate Reels: How Cinema Might Have Changed if History Rolled Differently.”
- “Francis Ford Coppola: Genius and Chaos in the Making of a Hollywood Legend.”
- Why the ARRI Alexa Mini Still Outnumbers Every 4K Flagship on Professional Sets
- “Marlon Brando: The Actor Who Changed Hollywood Forever.”
- “The Genius and the Scandal: Woody Allen’s Films and the Shadows Behind Them.”
- “Leonardo DiCaprio: The Reluctant Star Who Redefined Hollywood Stardom.”
- “Behind the Curtain: The Private World of Raymond Burr.”
- “From Pixels to Projectors: How Video Games Reshaped Modern Cinema.”
- “The Art of the Slow Burn: Revisiting 1970s American Cinema.”
- “Riding the Ponderosa: The Enduring Legacy of Bonanza.”
- “Navigating Nostalgia and Novelty in The Matrix Resurrections.”
- “Sin and Celluloid: Pre-Code Hollywood and the Scandalous Films Before the Censors Arrived.”
- North by Northwest: The Movie That Made Danger Look Effortlessly Cool.
- “Beyond the Lens: How Women Directors, Producers, and Writers Are Reshaping Cinema.”
- “Riding the Ponderosa: The Enduring Legacy of Bonanza.”
- “Beyond the Gavel: Cinema’s Most Compelling Courtroom Dramas.”
- Denzel Washington: Crafting a Legacy of Strength, Gravitas, and Change.
- “Blood, Power, and Legacy: The Godfather Trilogy’s Triumphs and Tragedies.”
- Visionaries Beyond Tomorrow: The Five Directors Who Reimagined Sci-Fi Cinema.
- “Greta Gerwig and the Rise of Women Behind the Camera in Hollywood.”
- “The Crown of Cinema: From Citizen Kane to The Godfather.”
- The Evolution of James Bond: Six Decades of Cinema’s Most Enduring Spy.
- The Man Behind the Cape: The Life and Tragic Fall of George Reeves.
- The 24-290 mm Paradox: Why a 12× Zoom from 2001 Still Outresolves Today’s 8K Sensors
- The 100 mm Paradox: Why the “Boring” Focal Length Is Quietly Becoming the Most Dangerous Tool on Set
- The Invisible Science Behind the "Natural" Look: How Modern Optics Quietly Rewrite Cinematic Language
- Mastering Smooth Transitions: How Crane Systems Shape Emotional Storytelling
- The Evolution of Compact Cinema Cameras: From Studio Rigs to Agile Setups