Frequently named perpetual motion magnets the magnetic field creates apparent movement that appears to be a form of energy, thus the expression perpetual motion magnets, is this really perpetual motion? Not in the form of the purest definition of perpetual motion, to be named perpetual motion magnets as currently defined they must go on to produce energy constantly, magnets little by little lose its magnetic powers. Since the time when magnets were found, many Scientist in the study of energy have tried to harness the magnetic energy to change this into a useful power source. In the mid-70's Bruce De Palma, a highly esteemed Scientist in the work of energy scientific discipline, astounded the Science World with a device that could harness the magnetic field to develop power. He effectively showed the theory that magnetic field energy could render movement that can be changed into an operable energy. Published, considerably authenticated and complete with Patent Rights with unbiased verification the N-Machine was marked the perpetual motion magnets device, a name that has stayed with it until today.

While working in Australia on a new project De Palma's idea of perpetual motion magnets got the curiosity of two part-time inventors, Ludwig Brits and Victor Christie. The concept was proven but could they construct one that would work? Understanding the theory the real question was if they construct one? With small cash on hand and using up-to-date technology they completed the initial prototype of the perpetual motion magnets device in 1993. The prototype functioned, with fine tuning they duplicate the same power ratio of the 1st perpetual motion magnets device of one unit of power in to five units of power output. Brits and Christie continued on and got addition financial backing to redesigned the perpetual motion magnets device cutting down the size more to more or less bigger than a football. Soon after many tests the new perpetual motion magnets device was completed in 1997 with a much high ratio of energy input to energy output. De Palma register Patent Rights were to run out in 1997 on the perpetual motion magnets device and he backed and promoted Brits and Christie to get new registered Patent Rights.

The news media became aware of the creation of a perpetual motion magnets device and played a full feature in 1997, this made a turbulence of backlash from professionals that did not study the machine, in their perspective perpetual motion magnets were impossible to reach, despite the supporting certification. This also got the attention of the US Administration, they asserted that original registered Patent Rights were issued in the US Patent Office to De Palma a citizen of the US; so the perpetual motion magnets device went to them. The Australian Politics stood firm in a neutral position, with no legal grounds this official objection shortly faded.

The attention from Government Agencies disturbed Brits and Christie; they redirected their attempts to Cyberspace to make this information to the general population. They provided detail plans on how to construct the perpetual motion magnets device, complete with the historical developing work. The intentional function was to bring the operational device into the average public and render source capital to begin manufacture of the perpetual motion magnets device to offer to the public. The aim was achieved with over ten thousand blueprints sold and 1000s of operating perpetual motion magnets machines working in households around the world. During 1999 Brits and Christie were approached by a corporation from China that sought to manufacture the perpetual motion magnets device, they agreed, and sole rights to manufacture the perpetual motion magnets device under their Patent was made. The new partner begun to manufacture the perpetual motion magnets device under another name, but their purpose was never to sell the device but to lease it to the general public, in addition the numbers of production is very limited and only for one client, Chinese held companies.

This was not the desired outcomes or intent, by legal contract Brits and Christie could not offer for sale a completely assembled perpetual motion magnets device, nevertheless they could lawfully continue to sell detailed blueprints of the perpetual motion magnets device for home use, and they continue to so today under the original name of MagiWorks.

Once more it has been established that the worst vendor of a innovative innovation is the inventor, and this unfortunately is true for the perpetual motion magnets device.

De Palma nor Brits and Christie never laid claim that their machine was perpetual motion magnets this was attached by others and regrettably it is a term that has stuck. The perpetual motion magnets device is not perpetual power or free power, it takes in energy and is a mechanical machine, but it does yield more electrical power then it takes in, is pollution free, is small and costs less than filling up an automobile with gasoline. Because the friction is very low the perpetual motion magnets device makes little noise and can continuously run for 5 years or longer powering an full home with essential no maintenance.