When A Diagnosis of Metastatic Prostate Cancer Could Have Been Avoided By Screening
- Author Joseph Hernandez
- Published January 12, 2011
- Word count 834
Picture finding out that you have prostate cancer. That’s hard because "cancer" is a word that engenders dread. Still perhaps, you tell yourself, possibly it is not that bad. Possibly we diagnosed it before it metastasized and with the right treatment I’ll beat it.
But it gets worse. Imagine then discovering that is too late for that. The cancer has already metastasized to other areas of your body. A cure is thus no longer a possibility. Treatment will at most slow down the disease. And later, after that treatment no longer works, treatment that will lessen the pain from the ever growing cancer.
And then the news gets still worse. Imagine at this point discovering that your physician in whom you placed your faith to keep you healthy and to alert you of any possible health problems, had information that you were likely to develop prostate cancer. Think about discovering that your physician had this information for at least a year prior to when you learned you had cancer. And picture finding out that had your doctor had informed you when the data was first available your cancer could have been discovered while it was still contained within the prostate gland and could have been cured.
Do you think such a thing will never happen ? Then consider the following cases:
Case:
For a 3 year period an internist failed to notify his patient that the results of blood tests revealed that the patient’s PSA level was not only high it was also climbing. By the time the physician eventually told his patient about the test results the result was a diagnosis of advanced prostate cancer. The only options offered for treatment then were radiation therapy and hormone therapy - applied in an effort to slow the cancer’s growth and spread.
Case:
Not only did the doctor in this case not tell his patient his PSA level had been abnormal and rising, the doctor in fact stated to him that they were normal. The patient learned he had cancer of the prostate because he consulted with a urologist at the urging of a family member. The diagnosis - prostate cancer that had spread to the seminal vesicles.
Case:
A family doctor performed a physical examination of the patient's prostate and found that his prostate gland had a hardened region. The physician did not notify his patient. The physician did not refer the patient to a urologist . The physician also did not perform a biopsy to determine whether the hardened area was cancerous or benign. When the patient eventually discovered the cancer it had already metastasized to other parts of his body.
Case:
For 2 1/22 years a man's doctor withheld information that his PSA levels were elevated. When the individual was ultimately told he had prostate cancer he tried surgery in the hopes that the cancer was still confined to the prostate gland and that surgery could eliminate the cancer. He also underwent months of hormonal therapy. And then post-surgical PSA levels confirmed that the surgery did not eliminate the cancer and that it is still present in his body.
There were law firms that represented the patients and families in each of the cases discussed above. The law firms that handled these lawsuits documented being able to obtain compensation for the patients and their families in amounts that ranged from $400,000 to $1,500,000.
Cases like the above come up all too frequently. Whether the physicians fail to look at the results of the tests, whether they buy into the believe that there is no need to take action even though the PSA is elevated or a nodule of a certain size is detected in the prostate, or whether they simply do not understand the guidelines and the standard of care for the action that is appropriate when screening results are abnormal, these doctors cause a delay that results in the growth and spread of the cancer.
Some physicians do not think that there is any advantage to screening men for prostate cancer (or do not appreciate the guidelines) and either just do not screen their male patients or recommend against it. Other doctors do not review the results of screening tests. Yet other doctors fail to follow up on an abnormal screening test result and not order a biopsy or refer the patient to a specialist. The result is often tragic: an avoidable death that becomes unavoidable.
What if you were the patient who received that news. You fight the cancer as hard and as long as you can. What if you were his spouse? What if you were his child? What if the patient was your son?
Perhaps you would decide to bring a case for medical malpractice to protect your family’s future. And you hope that if forced to confront the mistake and to pay a cost for it, maybe, just maybe, the doctor will adjust how he or she treats other patients afterward so that this tragedy will never arise again.
Joseph Hernandez is an attorney accepting cancer malpractice cases. To learn about prostate cancer and other cancer matters including breast cancer metastasis visit the websites
Article source: https://articlebiz.comRate article
Article comments
There are no posted comments.
Related articles
- Motorcycle Accidents in Hattiesburg: Mississippi's Pure Comparative Fault Advantage and How It Protects Injured Riders
- Dog Bite Injuries in Colorado: How the Strict Liability Statute Works and What Injured Victims Can Recover
- Truck Accident Claims in Green Bay: How Local Industries Shape Liability
- Dog Bites in San Luis Obispo: California's Strict Liability & What It Means for Victims
- How the Region's Paper and Food Processing Industries Shape the Commercial Vehicle Liability Landscape
- Colorado Dog Bite Injury Claims and What the State's Strict Liability Law Means for Victims
- What Are the Common Contract Issues That Require Legal Assistance?
- California Tax Liens vs. Federal Tax Liens: What's the Difference
- Why you need a Wills & estates lawyer
- How the IRS Fresh Start Program Actually Works (And Who Qualifies)
- Super Visa Income Requirement Just Changed — Your Certified Immigration Consultant Explains What It Means for Your Family
- Certified Immigration Consultant Explains the Most Serious Express Entry Mistakes
- Trusted Immigration Consultant Explains Canadian Experience Class Draw March 17, 2026
- What a Foster Care Abuse Attorney in Orlando Can Do for Your Case
- Why You Need a Personal Injury Attorney in Nashua After a Pedestrian Accident
- How Do Spousal Sponsorship and Express Entry Lawyers in Toronto Handle Complex Immigration Laws?
- Why Hiring a Local Truck Accident Attorney in Waltham Increases Your Settlement
- How Do Family Lawyers Oshawa Approach Complex Family Matters?
- How a Car Accident Attorney in Arlington, MA Can Win Your Case
- How an Oklahoma City Personal Injury Attorney Protects Your Rights After an Accident
- The Advantage of Hiring a Fort Lauderdale Personal Injury Attorney Near You
- Company Formation in Spain: A Complete Guide to Setup Your Business
- Professional Will Writing Services in the UK
- The Importance of Preparation and Evidence in Legal Proceedings
- Why Hiring a Larkspur Personal Injury Attorney Can Maximize Your Compensation After an Accident
- How Stockton Personal Injury Attorneys Handle Insurance Companies
- Top Benefits of Choosing Yoga Teacher Training in Rishikesh
- The Biggest “Near Miss” Data Breaches You’ve Never Heard About
- Prenuptial Agreements in Ontario: Things You Need to Know Before You Sign
- When Should You Seek an Attorney for a Construction Dispute?