Man Dies Of Prostate Cancer Even Though Physicians Knew Of Symptoms And His Abnormal Screening Test Results
- Author Joseph Hernandez
- Published January 31, 2011
- Word count 525
Many of us have had the experience of consulting more than one doctor regarding a medical concern merely to learn that the doctors consulted do not agree with each other. In the event a misdiagnosis could actually mean the difference between life and death this might create a serious problem for the patient. When the patient is made aware of each physician's conclusions and the reason for those conclusions the the patient can reach an informed decision based on his or her level of risk tolerance. It becomes more complicated, however, when the one physician who is on the right track does not communicate his or her suspicions and the other physicians are missing the signs and not ordering the appropriate tests.
One such situation happened in the following reported case. A number of doctors had a chance to detect the man's prostate cancer when it was in its early stages. The man first consulted with his primary care physician (PCP), a general practitioner, with urinary problems at 56 years old age. The general practitioner decided that the issues were not associated with cancer even though no testing was done to rule out cancer.
Ten months afterwards the man was examined by a urologist who performed a physical examination on the prostate gland and ordered a PSA blood test. As it turned out this urologist did not practice in the patient's insurance network and so the patient went to a second urologist. The PSA test ordered by the first urologist came back and that urologist advised a biopsy. However, that recommendation apparently did not get communicated to the family doctor or the urologist approved by the insurance company. The second urologist concluded that the examination of the prostate was normal and that there was no evidence of cancer.
It took another two years when the patient’s prostate cancer was at long last detected. By that time, the cancer had spread beyond the prostate and was now advanced. Had the cancer been diagnosed when the patient initially complained of urinary problems, when he saw the first urologist, or even when he saw the second urologist, it would not have yet spread and, with treatment, the patient would have had approximately 97% likelihood of surviving the cancer. Since the cancer was already advanced , however, the patient was not expected to survive more than five years. The law firm that handled this matter documented that they were able to obtain a settlement during jury selection at trial for $2.5 million on behalf of the patient.
As the claim discussed above reveals, having more than one physician for the same issue might lead to multiple mistakes. The first error consisted of not following the screening guidelines. This was a mistake committed by both the general practitioner and the second urologist. Additionally there was the failure of communication among the several physicians. Although there is no way to know whether the family doctor or the second urologist would have followed up on results of the PSA test from the first urologist or on that urologist’s suspicion and recommendation they at a minimum would have had information and perspective they were missing.
Joseph Hernandez is an attorney accepting medical malpractice cases. To learn about prostate cancer and other cancer matters including colon cancer visit the websites
Article source: https://articlebiz.comRate article
Article comments
There are no posted comments.
Related articles
- Pedestrian Accidents: Know Your Legal Rights from a Brownsville Personal Injury Lawyer
- Choosing the Best Greenville Injury Attorney for Workplace Injuries
- Choosing the Best Greenville Injury Attorney for Workplace Injuries
- International Shipping Made Simple with DTDC International Courier
- Choosing the Right International Shipping Services and Understanding International Shipping Rates
- Send Parcels Worldwide with a Trusted International Courier Service in Delhi
- Navigating Family Law with a Divorce Lawyer in Austin
- My employer has presented me with a Settlement Agreement. What do I do now?
- Behind Every Successful Deal: The Lawyer’s Role in M&A Strategy
- Why You Need a Personal Injury Attorney in Seattle After an Accident
- Why You Need a Local Irvine Personal Injury Lawyer After an Accident
- Why Local Expertise Matters: Benefits of Hiring an Indiana Car Accident Lawyer
- Why Foreclosure Defense Matters
- How Personal Injury Lawyers in North Charleston Handle Insurance Companies
- From Your Home to Anywhere – Reliable Global Shipping Solutions
- Temporary WiFi and Data Analytics in Events
- How an Okatie Car Accident Lawyer Can Help with a Hit-and-Run Case
- Content Analysis: Uncovering the Hidden Meaning
- criminal defense attorney irvine
- 7 Mistakes to Avoid When Hiring a Personal Injury Lawyer in Clearfield
- 10 Signs You Need a Personal Injury Lawyer in Rockford
- Why You Should Hire a Personal Injury Lawyer in Tampa After an Accident
- Canada’s Regions Blocking Low-Wage LMIAs
- How the IRS Is Changing and Why You Need a Tax Attorney Now More Than Ever
- When to Call a Car Accident Lawyer in San Antonio After a Wreck
- What to Expect During Your First Consultation With a New Haven Personal Injury Lawyer
- How a Waterbury Auto Accident Lawyer Can Maximize Your Settlement
- Contracts That Win: Why Legal Precision Is Key to Business Success
- How the IRS Is Cracking Down on Tax Debt (And What You Can Do About It)
- Top Questions to Ask a Carmel Personal Injury Lawyer During Your Consultation