Required Elements to for Winning a Medical Malpractice Case

BusinessLegal

  • Author Jimmy Pritcher Iii
  • Published December 24, 2011
  • Word count 635

Medical malpractice occurs from a negligent act by a medical professional during patient handling. All healthcare service providers whether doctor, nurse, technician are expected to uphold a standard of care . Failing to do so could result in injury to the person and lead to a valid medical malpractice case .

A fruitful medical malpractice suit is founded on several elements. Dissatisfaction with the results of medical treatment is not enough to win a malpractice case. In general , all health related results are not 100 percent guaranteed positive. In addition, unexpected outcomes from treatment does not automatically mean neglect .

Elements of Proof for a Medical Malpractice Lawsuit .

A majority of malpractice cases are founded on provider negligence . The burden of proof rests with the person claiming medical malpractice happened . Most courts expect several components to prove and win a health related malpractice case. These four components are: breach of duty, duty of care, injury and proximate cause.

Duty of Care.

Duty of care occurs between the patient and medical care provider, i.e. doctor, nurse or infirmary. This is a legal duty based on the provider-patient relationship and should uphold professional criteria.

This obligation of tending lies in the actions a reasonable medical care provider would carry out in similar contexts . The specific activities might even vary according to the area and sort of health care provider.

Breach of Duty.

Breach of duty is determined by evidence that the health care provider did not stick to reasonable competent activities. This is based on showing what another healthcare professional would have done. Expert witnesses within the same profession and medical literature should show a deviation from conventional standards of care.

Generally , expert witnesses supply testimony that the activities taken by the charged provider were unreasonable .

Injury or Damages.

Proof that the patient obtained below conventional care from a healthcare provider is usually half the battle . The following step to proving medical malpractice involves showing the deficiency of care resulted in trauma or damage to the patient. Damages possible for recovery in a medical malpractice claim are similar to a personal injury or wrongful death case.

This may be difficult if the patient was not in good health prior to medical treatment. Naturally this is unlikely since health related treatment was necessary. However , proof involves establishing that the patient's current state of health was directly caused by the negligent medical handling.

A person filing a medical malpractice claim must prove the probability of a dissimilar health related outcome lacking getting substandard attention . Exhibiting that the medical outcome could have been different is not adequate.

Proximate Cause.

The fourth element of proving a medical malpractice case necessitates proximate cause. This consists of legitimate fact, not some other event, that establishes the trauma or damage took place. Legally, there is sufficient evidence to show liability if the cause ( activities by healthcare provider) results in an effect ( sickness or injury).

The courts will look at the events that resulted in injury. For example, a patient stayed in the hospital for several weeks after treatment. Proof is required that the hospital stay would have been less than three days if not for negligence.

An Exception to the Burden of Proof.

Most laws recognise the troubles a patient might confront in establishing medical malpractice. In some cases, a patient could invoke "res ipsa loquitur," a legal doctrine that requires the patient to only prove an injury would not have taken place without negligence .

This transfers the burden of proof onto the health care provider to establish negligence did not happen . To do this successfully, the patient must prove that evidence is not gettable ; they are not responsible the harm ; the health provider had sole command over the process that caused the injury ; and, no other process outside the health care provider's command caused the injury.

Hollywood Florida injury lawyer The Injury Law Clinic specializes in helping those who have been injured in an accident in South Florida. If you need an attorney for a Hollywood Florida medical malpractice suit, get in touch with The Injury Law Clinic today.

Article source: https://articlebiz.com
This article has been viewed 764 times.

Rate article

Article comments

There are no posted comments.

Related articles