How are Documents Authenticated in Civil Lawsuits
- Author Manuel Salvacion
- Published February 3, 2008
- Word count 528
Documents such as records, letters, bills, contracts, and similar writing form part of evidence in many lawsuits. In court, the best evidence rule requires that when a document is offered as evidence, the original document or writing has to be produced and submitted. To be admitted as evidence, a document has to be properly identified or authenticated.
In dealing with documentary evidence, the following things must be considered:
• Parole evidence – This is a principle in the common law of contracts which presumes that a written contract embodies the complete agreement between parties. As a rule, it forbids the introduction of ‘extrinsic’ information or external communication between parties, other than what is contained in the document.
• Best evidence – The issue in documentary evidence is competency, Hence, the best evidence rule in documents means the ‘the best and topmost form of evidence that can be produced for verification’.
• Authentication
• Hearsay – Based on legal definition, hearsay is evidence not proceeding from the personal knowledge of the witness, but is from the mere repetition of what he has heard others say.
What is Authentication?
Authentication is a rule that requires evidence to be sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims. This means that evidence must be proven genuine to be admissible.
Both parties in a trial can authenticate documentary evidence in much the same way as it can authenticate other real evidence. These are the common methods of document authentication:
• A witness, who is present during the signing of the document, can identify and attest to the existence of the document.
• A non-expert witness who is familiar with the handwriting or signature of the person, who signed the document, can also testify.
• An expert, a document examiner, who can compare handwriting samples and give his opinion regarding the document
• By so-called "trier of fact," in which the jury or the judge would compare a known example of a signature with the signature on a disputed document
• Records of business transactions can be identified and authenticated by the custodian of the records.
• Certified copies of public records, official documents, and newspapers are self-authenticating documents that do not require outside authentication to be admitted as court evidence.
• Ancient documents also do not require outside authentication to be used as evidence. When presented with a corroborating circumstances or possession, ancient documents can be admitted as evidence in a trial.
Written documents when presented as evidence in courts are called documentary evidence. They form part of the basis for the resolution of cases.
However, certain documents do not require validation to be considered as original documents. Self-authenticating documents or documents that do not require outside authentication are the following:
-
acknowledge documents to prove receipt of such
-
some commercial paper and related documents
-
certificates of business records
-
certified copies of public records
-
newspapers
-
official documents
-
periodicals
-
trade inscriptions
Why Document Authentication is Necessary
If properly authenticated, documents can provide the courts the necessary information and help a judge or jury evaluate a case. Proper documents also provide resolution of the issue under question. In civil litigations, documentary evidence is an important part in determining the outcome of a case.
For more information about civil litigations, consult with competent California attorney services at http://www.attorneyservicesetc.com/Civil-Litigations.html
Article source: https://articlebiz.comRate article
Article comments
Related articles
- Why Foreclosure Defense Matters
- How an Okatie Car Accident Lawyer Can Help with a Hit-and-Run Case
- Content Analysis: Uncovering the Hidden Meaning
- criminal defense attorney irvine
- 7 Mistakes to Avoid When Hiring a Personal Injury Lawyer in Clearfield
- 10 Signs You Need a Personal Injury Lawyer in Rockford
- Why You Should Hire a Personal Injury Lawyer in Tampa After an Accident
- Canada’s Regions Blocking Low-Wage LMIAs
- How the IRS Is Changing and Why You Need a Tax Attorney Now More Than Ever
- When to Call a Car Accident Lawyer in San Antonio After a Wreck
- What to Expect During Your First Consultation With a New Haven Personal Injury Lawyer
- How a Waterbury Auto Accident Lawyer Can Maximize Your Settlement
- Contracts That Win: Why Legal Precision Is Key to Business Success
- How the IRS Is Cracking Down on Tax Debt (And What You Can Do About It)
- Top Questions to Ask a Carmel Personal Injury Lawyer During Your Consultation
- Treasury Department Drastically Narrows Corporate Transparency Act Requirements
- NFPA 96 Compliance and Hood Cleaning: Captive Aire Hood vs. Accurex Hoods, Greenheck Systems
- Future First Criminal Law
- Breaking News: FinCEN Pauses Corporate Transparency Act Enforcement
- Popcat Coin Price Prediction: 2025, 2030, and the Next Bull Run
- What to Expect When Hiring an Oakland-Based Auto Accident Attorney
- How Hartford Injury Attorneys Help After a Truck Accident
- How Federal Legislation Could Impact Michigan's Online Poker
- How a Criminal Lawyer in Ann Arbor Can Protect Your Rights
- Benefits of Remote Online Notarization for Individuals and Businesses
- The Benefits of Using A Mobile Notary Service: Convenience, Flexibility, and Choice
- Top 10 Most Common Notarized Documents You Need to Know
- 5 Ways to Find Affordable Notary Services Near You
- Why Bangladesh Needs the ACNCC Now?
- How a Calgary Personal Injury Lawyer Can Maximize Your Compensation