Family Law Case Updater
- Author David Siegel
- Published February 15, 2008
- Word count 473
Change in Circumstances
The uncontroverted evidence was such that the child support order should have been reduced or modified to reflect respondent's financial resources which at best could have been described as limited. In order to justify a decrease in child support payments, the moving party is required to show a significant material change in the circumstances and conditions of the divorced parents since the entry of the original divorce decree. In order to justify a decrease in child support payments, the moving party is required to show a significant material change in the circumstances and conditions of the divorced parents since the entry of the original divorce decree. The issue before the trial court on a motion to modify child support payments was whether the circumstances of the parties and the children had materially changed since the divorce decree, and only if that were so would a modification of the child support be proper. In all cases where petitions to modify payments under a divorce decree are involved, the primary question is whether or not changes in circumstances of the parties justify the modification. In an application for modification or termination of support, the only inquiry should be whether sufficient cause has intervened since the entry of the decree to authorize the court to change the allowance.
Child Support
Child support provisions in a dissolution agreement adopted by the trial court are void, in excess of the court's jurisdiction, if the trial court could not order those provisions in the absence of the agreement.
Life Insurance
In a divorce case, where there was no reason to believe that the husband, or his estate, would not be able to provide the mandated child support, the trial court's decision not to require the husband to maintain a life insurance policy naming his children as the irrevocable beneficiaries was not against the manifest weight of the evidence.
Consent Decrees
The statutory power of a court to reduce the amount of periodic payments, whether by way of alimony or child support, is not defeated by the fixing of the amount of the payments in a settlement agreement which was incorporated in the decree.
Continuing Jurisdiction
Regardless of the presence ort absence of any language limiting modification of contract terms, provisions relating to the support of minor children are always modifiable. A court is concerned with the adequacy of a child support award when made; the wife can always petition for an increase in the future.
Contract
While defendant was under no legal obligation to leave his estate or any part of it to the children and his obligation to do so was created by contract and only by the contract, the contract could not be altered without his consent and the court was without authority to modify it or to enter a decree contrary to it.
Phoenix divorce and family law firm handling divorce and family law cases throughout Phoenix and the surrounding areas. Results driven law firm with experience and skill to handle the most difficult cases.
http://www.divorce-lawyers-phoenix.com
Article source: https://articlebiz.comRate article
Article comments
There are no posted comments.
Related articles
- Pedestrian Accidents: Know Your Legal Rights from a Brownsville Personal Injury Lawyer
- Choosing the Best Greenville Injury Attorney for Workplace Injuries
- Choosing the Best Greenville Injury Attorney for Workplace Injuries
- International Shipping Made Simple with DTDC International Courier
- Choosing the Right International Shipping Services and Understanding International Shipping Rates
- Send Parcels Worldwide with a Trusted International Courier Service in Delhi
- Navigating Family Law with a Divorce Lawyer in Austin
- My employer has presented me with a Settlement Agreement. What do I do now?
- Behind Every Successful Deal: The Lawyer’s Role in M&A Strategy
- Why You Need a Personal Injury Attorney in Seattle After an Accident
- Why You Need a Local Irvine Personal Injury Lawyer After an Accident
- Why Local Expertise Matters: Benefits of Hiring an Indiana Car Accident Lawyer
- Why Foreclosure Defense Matters
- How Personal Injury Lawyers in North Charleston Handle Insurance Companies
- From Your Home to Anywhere – Reliable Global Shipping Solutions
- Temporary WiFi and Data Analytics in Events
- How an Okatie Car Accident Lawyer Can Help with a Hit-and-Run Case
- Content Analysis: Uncovering the Hidden Meaning
- criminal defense attorney irvine
- 7 Mistakes to Avoid When Hiring a Personal Injury Lawyer in Clearfield
- 10 Signs You Need a Personal Injury Lawyer in Rockford
- Why You Should Hire a Personal Injury Lawyer in Tampa After an Accident
- Canada’s Regions Blocking Low-Wage LMIAs
- How the IRS Is Changing and Why You Need a Tax Attorney Now More Than Ever
- When to Call a Car Accident Lawyer in San Antonio After a Wreck
- What to Expect During Your First Consultation With a New Haven Personal Injury Lawyer
- How a Waterbury Auto Accident Lawyer Can Maximize Your Settlement
- Contracts That Win: Why Legal Precision Is Key to Business Success
- How the IRS Is Cracking Down on Tax Debt (And What You Can Do About It)
- Top Questions to Ask a Carmel Personal Injury Lawyer During Your Consultation