Statutes of Limitations-Part 2
- Author Raymond L
- Published March 18, 2008
- Word count 744
If he delays even just a few months, the injured auto accident
victim can suffer the loss of his case or may lose the right to sue
his primary defendant and all or most of what he might have recovered
in his case if he had only acted promptly. This may occur, for
example, where there are other provisions of law providing much
shorter periods than the statute of limitations within which the
accident victim must act to preserve his right to sue. One example of
such laws existing in many states, including California, is the
"government claims provisions." These requirements apply in a wide
variety of auto accident cases, for example where a contributing cause
of the accident is a road design defect or failure to properly
maintain a roadway. The government claims provisions would also apply
if the driver who hit you was a city or county or state employee at
the time of the accident, operating his car in the course and scope of
his employment.
In each of these cases the injured auto accident victim must file
a government claim with the city or county or state within 6 months, a
time period obviously much shorter than the 2 year California statute
of limitations applicable in auto accident cases.
In the example of the driver who turned out to be a government
employee, yes, of course, you might still sue the driver of the car,
but if he has a 15/30,000 dollar auto insurance liability policy, that
will be of little consolation to the brain damaged or paraplegic
plaintiff. On the other hand, if the same man or woman had consulted
an appropriately qualified lawyer, the lawyer would have recognized
the need to timely file the government claim within 6 months of the
date of the accident, and he would have followed the other claims
procedures essential to file suit against a public entity. The client
could then have obtained full recovery for his injury, his general
damages, his pain and suffering, his damages for loss of enjoyment of
life, his past and future medical expenses, and full recompense for
his past and future earnings losses.
Turning now to the statute of limitations for medical malpractice,
and why we urge that you should not attempt to interpret it, apply it,
act upon it or fail to act upon it without first obtaining competent
legal advice, lets consider California's 1 year "discovery rule," and
3 year "outside limitation." The California medical malpractice
statute of limitations provides that actions against health care
providers must be filed within 1 year of the date that the malpractice
victim discovers or reasonably should have "discovered his cause of
action; but even if the cause of action is not discovered, and even
where it could not have been discovered, the action is barred after
the passing of three years from the date of the malpractice.
Let's take a couple of real cases, prosecuted by the author of
this article. In the first, an expectant mother sought the care of a
physician who dispensed to her a sedative as recommended by a well
known drug manufacturer. The drug caused the mother no side effects,
but her child was born with serious limb defects. The drug was later
identified in the press world wide as a potent teratogen, although by
its European name, not by the brand name under which it was dispensed
in the United States, and so the mother had no idea that it was the
drug that caused her daughter's limb defects. The child was born in
1962, and she showed up at our law offices an adult, 29 years later.
In the meantime, the first special California medical malpractice
statute of limitations was enacted in 1970, providing a 1 year
discovery rule and most significant here, a 4 year outside limitation.
The mother hadn't filed suit during the girl's minority, and the girl,
now a young woman, didn't file her case within the four years. In
1975 a second version of the malpractice statute was enacted,
providing for a three year outside rule statute of limitations.
Because the young woman was still unaware of the cause of her birth
defects again this three year time passed without her filing suit.
When the woman described her injuries to this author, they seemed
to coincide with the injuries caused by the potent teratogen, and so
we obtained the list of physicians to whom the drug company supplied
the drug. Her mother's physician, it turned out, was one of them.
Raymond L. Henke, Principle trial attorney Medical Malpractice Lawyer with the California California Statutes of Limitations & California Accident Lawyers .
Article source: https://articlebiz.comRate article
Article comments
There are no posted comments.
Related articles
- Why Foreclosure Defense Matters
- How an Okatie Car Accident Lawyer Can Help with a Hit-and-Run Case
- Content Analysis: Uncovering the Hidden Meaning
- criminal defense attorney irvine
- 7 Mistakes to Avoid When Hiring a Personal Injury Lawyer in Clearfield
- 10 Signs You Need a Personal Injury Lawyer in Rockford
- Why You Should Hire a Personal Injury Lawyer in Tampa After an Accident
- Canada’s Regions Blocking Low-Wage LMIAs
- How the IRS Is Changing and Why You Need a Tax Attorney Now More Than Ever
- When to Call a Car Accident Lawyer in San Antonio After a Wreck
- What to Expect During Your First Consultation With a New Haven Personal Injury Lawyer
- How a Waterbury Auto Accident Lawyer Can Maximize Your Settlement
- Contracts That Win: Why Legal Precision Is Key to Business Success
- How the IRS Is Cracking Down on Tax Debt (And What You Can Do About It)
- Top Questions to Ask a Carmel Personal Injury Lawyer During Your Consultation
- Treasury Department Drastically Narrows Corporate Transparency Act Requirements
- NFPA 96 Compliance and Hood Cleaning: Captive Aire Hood vs. Accurex Hoods, Greenheck Systems
- Future First Criminal Law
- Breaking News: FinCEN Pauses Corporate Transparency Act Enforcement
- Popcat Coin Price Prediction: 2025, 2030, and the Next Bull Run
- What to Expect When Hiring an Oakland-Based Auto Accident Attorney
- How Hartford Injury Attorneys Help After a Truck Accident
- How Federal Legislation Could Impact Michigan's Online Poker
- How a Criminal Lawyer in Ann Arbor Can Protect Your Rights
- Benefits of Remote Online Notarization for Individuals and Businesses
- The Benefits of Using A Mobile Notary Service: Convenience, Flexibility, and Choice
- Top 10 Most Common Notarized Documents You Need to Know
- 5 Ways to Find Affordable Notary Services Near You
- Why Bangladesh Needs the ACNCC Now?
- How a Calgary Personal Injury Lawyer Can Maximize Your Compensation