Can a press conference become a scientist?
- Author Thomas H Cullen
- Published April 2, 2018
- Word count 736
Can a press conference become a scientist?
By Thomas H Cullen
I find this question sacred. Naturally, the idea in and of itself is important, but it’s a case in which the question which represents the idea can take on a protective quality.
Reality is made up of questions. Questions are the routine of reality. It’s impossible to be born and to die without asking any. However, is it ever actually the nature of questions to "overcome reality"? Overcome is one way of looking at it. Protection is another.
For me, a particular mystery about the question – of whether a press conference can become a scientist – is if the idea of the question being protective is at odds with the merit of the question.
A press conference is an event; one which is made up of a series of events. A scientist is not an event, but instead is a being. A being is a force that’s meant to make up events. Thus, a being can be assigned the identity "creator of event".
Since it’s the being who goes by as "creator of event", it’s therefore logical to deduce that it’s the event which goes by as "not creator of event". A "not creator of event" is a force which has to be sentient, because of the mere act of identification. If the force were simply non-sentient, that would mean that the identifier would have no cause to identify it. The "not creator of event" and the "creator of event" are both sentient, and the reason is because they are both subject to an identifier.
The press conference is sentient, because it is an event, and an event has the ability to be subject to an identifier.
Obviously, the logic that’s been put on display here hasn’t the right to be presumed as exempt from scrutiny. On the other hand though, is the logic good enough to protect itself?
An event is sentient, since it is subject to an identifier. The identifier is sentient, by default. Since it’s the identifier that’s sentient "by default", that in turn dictates that the creator of event is "not sentient by default". The creator of event is sentient, the identifier is sentient, and the not creator of event is sentient; the first sentience is sentient due to condition, the second sentience is sentient by default, and the third sentience is sentient due to being subject to sentience by default.
To put into different terms: a being is by condition, an event is by being subject to no condition, and the identifier is by no condition.
What does this mean? The actual objective is to determine if a press conference can become a scientist – to determine if an event can imitate a being (if the result of being subject to no condition can imitate the result of condition). To possibly help matters, identities should be truncated: the result of being subject to no condition can be altered into "being subject to condition", the result of condition can be altered into "no condition", and the result of no condition into condition.
The being is no condition. The event is by condition. The identifier is condition.
Of course, trying to illustrate or trying to prove that a press conference can become a scientist is next to physically impossible (any such ambition violates the condition of the universe), however, it’s interesting, ironic and even something of a saving grace to illustrate that a force can imitate any other force by way of no imitation.
Can a press conference become a scientist? Is the question the saving grace of reality? Is the question the saving grace of reality, but purely on the condition that the status of the question can’t be shared by the idea which gives rise to the question?
Personally, I’m inclined to let the idea and the question that comes from the idea be separate powers all while mutually possessing the status of saving reality. Reality is made up of ambition, yet it’s also the seeming truth to reality that an ambition can act as a shield to reality.
The day that a press conference does anything, let alone becomes a scientist, is the day that trees and motorways can no longer just be trees and motorways, or that opinions and thoughts can just be opinions and thoughts.
I wrote a story called The Representative, but couldn't get it published. I spend my days trying to be philosophical, pushing the envelope on philosophyArticle source: http://articlebiz.com
There are no posted comments.
- Examination is not a true test of knowledge
- 3 Philosophical Questions We Should Ask Ourselves Regularly
- On Honesty
- When every day, I tell Janice that I'm her mother, and that her mother is always with her
- When in Janice's orphanage, I talk to Janice about politics of observer being victory of politics over abstract
- When because of Juno Skinner, from True Lies, the US supernatural woman can help me create positive moral tragic
- When the American supernatural woman gave me The Representative, and my past anti-nationalism, so that I can enjoy helping her
- When 21 years ago, the supernatural US woman used Miramax's 54 to tell me that sexy sexy socialism is evil
- When Alicia Silverstone's Batgirl creates communism from tyranny data, so that Janice can live safely in Batman Forever
- When taking the piss takes the piss out of Valak, in the Mullins barn, so that science can be a series of AI psychologies
- When the American supernatural woman turns CNN into a false political anti-magic, so that she can be outsmarted by UK royalty
- When The Craft's Bonnie Harper wants me to love Janice, by turning UK humour's freedom from science into an evil evil
- When I become a UK Prime Minister, so that Alison Parker and Brittney Havers can protect my Annabelle: Creation body
- When I delete my story, The Representative, so that the American people can criticize me if I fail to love Janice
- When future robots choose to end American extramarital affairs, so that my brain can turn Annabelle Creation into a real reality
- When the GOP can't use 112 Ocean Avenue, because the sexiness of the US Senator Kamala Harris opposes Harvard University
- When European men and women are designed by nature to want to serve American businesswomen because the latters support monarchy
- When as Janice's sexy mother, I mess with Europe's royal women by having her see me smoke a cigar in a mansion hot tub
- When I can wear a sequin maxi dress for Janice, because Annabelle Creation has turned me into her sexy American mother
- When American mothers choose to oppose UK monarchs, so that Darth Maul is safe from extramarital affairs and press conferences
- When Scream's Sidney Prescott creates the US, so that Fox News can't copy the UK's vow to ABC's Cecilia Vega
- When The Sentinel's Alison Parker has UK royals think that space is a son of CNN, so that space can be a US trophy wife
- When CNN and the White House create science, so that FHM's Kelly Brook can't turn all adults into female supermodels
- When geology watches the 2004 movie Wild Things 2, in order to remember why it was that a wizard outsmarted the North Pole
- When Heaven refuses to use a mansion like a nightclub, so that all adults can try to wear a suit like ABC's Cecilia Vega
- Shame on You!
- A British computer, that defeats Egyptian Gods so that no aristocrat or monarch is the creator of the sexy American female CEO
- When CNN jumps up and down on outer space, so that a Spanish university can ignore a teddy bear in a nightclub
- An attractive American female CEO, who defeats an attractive British female aristocrat in a way that isn't hypocritical
- Metaphysical Reflections about Spinoza and his Concepts Pertaining to Metaphysics and God and the Wave Structure of Matter