Who is the master of the universe?

By Thomas H Cullen

On the surface, the ability to discover the identity of the master of the universe feels beyond futile. And this is the ability to discover. The term is not a synonym for God, but is meant to refer to a different being. Since it seems obvious that God’s nature can’t be deciphered, it then stands to reason that it’s within the realm of capability to decipher the nature of the master of the universe.

When it comes to the master of the universe, the relevant idea is to do with the accomplishment of purposefully pretending to be weak. The reverse of purposefully pretending to be weak is to accidently be a real strength – a synonym for accidently being a real strength is to accidently be weak.

So in essence: the identity of the master of the universe can be summed up as a being who has the right to revel in being accidently weak. Unto itself, a weakness is a perspective. An accident can’t be identical to a weakness, and therefore an accident is forced to be the lack of perspective – ergo, the master of the universe is a force which is the accomplishment of being a perspective that is not a perspective.

What is a perspective that isn’t a perspective? A perspective is a limit of knowledge, which then turns the question into the nature of a limit of knowledge that isn’t a limit of knowledge. Limitless knowledge is the same as limit, and so this creates a limitless limit.

If something is a limitless limit, this means that it is a restriction that is free. Restriction is the absence of travel. An absence of travel that is free is an absence of movement that is free; the free absence of movement is the unfree presence of no movement – the unfree presence of restriction.

The unfree presence of restriction is the restriction of presence of restriction. The presence of restriction is absence, and thus the master of the universe is simply the accomplishment of no restriction.

In a sense, this identity is a double-edged sword. There’s an obvious technical power at play, but then there’s also a lack of depth. Then again, doing the detail into the power can always perhaps resolve the disappointment.

An absence of restriction is a force that can go wherever it wants. The "force" and the "wherever" are obviously separate, and this is where the quest can potentially become interesting.

The "wherever" can’t be the master, which makes the location into the servant. A location is another term for separation. As a result, the master of the universe is not a separation but a unification, rendering the accomplishment into a unification that uses a separation.

In general, a unification is just an absence of split. The absence of split is the presence of no split, and the presence of no split is the presence of one. The presence of one of course isn’t identical to one, and therefore it’s fair to categorize the master as a deceptive one.

The separation is the presence of split, which makes the separation into the absence of no split – the absence of one. The absence of one isn’t identical to absence, and therefore it’s fair to categorize the servant as a deceptive absence.

The master is the use of a deceptive absence. The servant is used by a deceptive one.

A deceptive absence is the absence of deception. A deceptive one is one deception. One deception is honesty. The absence of deception is honesty.

The identity of the master of the universe is an honest force that has the power to use another honest force.

I was disappointed before, but no more. The idea of a force that can use another force without either side being corrupted is a fantastic idea. Truly inspiring. When one thinks of use – the general concept of use – it’s usually inevitable to associate the concept with corruption. Which is why the new revelation feels not just adequate but legitimately inspiring.

The master is an equal to all, who can use all to the protection of all.