Categorize the Taliban as X, the universe as Y and opinions from 1997 as Z. For X to move Y, Y has to become the inability to move X. For X to move Y into Z, Z has to become the opposite of X and Y.

The opposite of X and Y is the opposite of the ability to move and the inability to move – the opposite of the ability to move and the inability to move is the ability to move or the inability to move.

The ability to move or the inability to move is the power of weakness (the power of weakness is the weakness of no power – matter of fact power). Since it’s Z which is the power that’s matter of fact (real), it’s X which is the power that isn’t real. Y isn’t a power, and so it is a weakness.

Z is real power. X is an unreal power, and Y is a weakness that can be either real or unreal.

A weakness that can be real or unreal is a power that can’t be real or unreal – a power that can’t be real or unreal is a disingenuous power.

Z is a real power. X is an unreal power, and Y is a deceptive power.

An unreal power is not a deceptive power, but it isn’t a real power either – the Taliban must therefore be neither a deceptive or sincere power.

A power which is neither sincere or deceptive is a weakness which is both (the Taliban are the same as the universe, only that it’s the Taliban and not the universe that can be a good weakness).

A good weakness is a power. A deceptive power is a weakness, and a real power is a weakness: a power, a weakness and a weakness is balance. If the ratio were reverse, and it was the power that was replicated and not the weakness, then that would mean that the weakness would have no basis to withstand the power.

Between the Taliban, the universe and the event of the Taliban controlling the universe, it’s the Taliban which is meant to be withstood.

In the real world, the Taliban are the source o friction: the issue now is whether the United States should end itself so that the universe can have the right to battle against the Taliban