Evidence is just not what we have been told when it comes to Darwin's theory of evolution.In the creation vs evolution argument, nothing contradicts evolution like the fossil record.

Most of us have been told that the fossil evidence confirms Darwin's theory. Nothing could be further from the truth. The fossil record, in fact, is the worst endorsement for evolution in the creation vs evolution argument dispute.

How can this be so?

Our teachers have taught us that the fossil evidence shows the 'pathway' of evolution. The fossils that are necessary to give credibility to the evolutionary theory are 'intermediate fossils'. This would be the 'in-between' fossils that show us the steps of evolution between one kind of creature and another. If horses had evolved from dogs, for instance, then there should be many 'dorse' fossils found throughout the world.

Unless we can find many of these kinds of fossils (there should be literally millions of these) throughout the world, then there is absolutely no fossil evidence that evolution ever took place.

This does not seem to be good for evolutionists in the creation vs evolution debate.

Unfortunately for evolutionists, none of these 'in-between' have ever been found. Exactly zero have ever been verified in the last 150 years. (Whale evolution has been used lately, but this example is rife with scientific problems). The intermediate fossils of the past are now nothing more than just fossils of extinct creatures and nothing more.

The archaeopteryxwas considered to be one of these in-between fossils. This was a bird with claws on its wings. This was considered by many evolutionists to be a creature between reptiles and birds. It was revealed that this creature was found in a layer where birds existed already. This creature turned out to be nothing more than an extinct bird.

No 'in-between' fossils are left that can be used as an example. None. But our teachers and professors have told us that there are. The evidence in the creation vs evolution debate is missing for the evolutionists (even though the textbooks still proclaim that they do)

Even Charles Darwin admitted that if no intermediate fossils were discovered, his theory was no good. There was one thing that he did admit: no concrete evidence supported his theory, yet. (But he had much confidence in the fact that the evidence would be discovered very soon)There are still no fossils to show us that evolution ever occurred.

Creatiioniststs, on the other hand, have long said that the fossil record should show certain kinds of creatures with huge gaps in between each kind. This is exactly what the record shows by looking at the fossils.

Unfortunately for those that believe in Darwin's theory of evolution, the fossil record does not seem to support the theory.. The evidence in the creation vs evolution discussion clearly supports creationists in regard to the fossil record. Until intermediate fossils are discovered to support Darwin's theory , it would appear that this will continue to be the case.